Thursday, January 23, 2025
-3.9 C
New York

Jones v Kernott/ Man loses appeal in property split

Catherine Thomas, Director at leading law firm Vardags, which last year won the Radmacher case on prenups, comments on the Supreme Court ruling.           

“The Supreme Court today ruled that where cohabiting couples own their home in equal shares, the court can declare that a change in circumstances (often as a result of the breakdown of that relationship) has caused the ownership to change, even when the parties did not expressly agree to such a change.In this case that change was significant; from 50/50 to 90/10 in favour of the person who remained in the house.

“Many cohabiting couples who have decided not to marry will be surprised to learn that the court can impute an intention to them, which they may never have actually had, by looking into their behaviour over the entire relationship.In deciding to attribute to the parties the share of the property the court believes is ‘fair’, rather than what was actually agreed, it is moving towards the approach more traditionally seen in divorce.

“With more than 50% of children now being born outside of marriage in the UK, this case emphasises the importance of cohabiting couples obtaining proper legal advice both before purchasing a property together and in the event that the relationship breaks down.Failure to do so risks expensive litigation as the court considers property ownership in the context of the whole of the relationship.”

Five Supreme Court justices allowed an appeal by hairdresser Patricia Jones against an earlier ruling that ice-cream salesman Leonard Kernott was entitled to 50% of the value of the property in Thundersley, Essex – valued at £245,000 in 2008.

They said Ms Jones, of Thundersley, was entitled to 90% and Mr Kernott, of Benfleet, Essex, should get 10%.

The ruling, which followed a hearing in London, was the conclusion of a three-year legal battle, which had seen lawyers argue in a county court, the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

Ayesha Vardag graduated from Cambridge University with Honours in Law and from Brussels with a Master’s in European Law, working at the International Courts of Justice in the Hague and the UN(IAEA) in Vienna. She then trained and qualified as a finance lawyer at Linklaters London and Moscow on power station and diamond mine projects, before moving on to capital markets work at New York law firm Weil Gotshal & Manges. Ayesha was called to the Bar in 1999 and joined 4 New Square chambers, then crossed to family law at Sears Tooth. She founded Ayesha Vardag Solicitors, now Vardags (http://www.vardags.com) in 2005.

Hot this week

A Glimpse into Darkness: Freed Palestinian Prisoners Speak Out

As the first wave of female Palestinian prisoners were...

Global Implications of the Israel-Palestine Conflict: Weapons, Politics, and the Military Embargo

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, marked by...

Inside Eventus Equity: The Story of Europe’s Biggest Sports Trading Firm

The Story of Europe’s Biggest Sports Trading Firm… It might...

Benjamin Netanyahu Faces Genocide Allegations: An Israeli Lawyer’s Pursuit of Justice

As the international community’s gaze remains fixed on the...

Topics

A Glimpse into Darkness: Freed Palestinian Prisoners Speak Out

As the first wave of female Palestinian prisoners were...

Inside Eventus Equity: The Story of Europe’s Biggest Sports Trading Firm

The Story of Europe’s Biggest Sports Trading Firm… It might...

Benjamin Netanyahu Faces Genocide Allegations: An Israeli Lawyer’s Pursuit of Justice

As the international community’s gaze remains fixed on the...

Biden on Israel’s Actions: A Confession Of The Worst War Crimes

In a recent revelation, U.S. President Joe Biden openly...

Ceasefire in Gaza: A Pivotal Moment in Israel’s Defeat

The announcement of a ceasefire in Gaza marks a...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img